{"html":"\n

A colleague once told me a 5K aerial shot is just distance pretending to be depth. I disagreed then and I disagree now — but I wrote his objection down before arguing with it, because he was half right. Keeping the counterargument before the compliment is the most honest description of how I work: one foot in the footage, one foot in the spreadsheet.

\n

How the Notebooks Earn Their Keep

\n

My mornings are for reading images as data — grain, frame rate, the way a slow push across a reservoir says more about drought than any statistic I could quote. My afternoons turn that into sentences a newcomer can follow without being talked down to. Everything gets tested before it gets recommended. If I tell you where to stream something, I have watched it there, on an unreliable connection, at a strange hour. If I write about water moving through farms and factories, someone has already grown tired of my questions about meters and flow rates.

\n

\n
• Watch it twice: once for the story, once for the seams.
\n
• Keep a list of what surprised me rather than what confirmed me.
\n
• Read past the summary, since primary sources are usually shorter than the argument about them.
\n
• Write the beginner explanation last, and never condescend inside it.
\n

\n

Say Hello

\n

If you have a reading recommendation, a correction, or a question I have not thought to ask yet, I would genuinely like to hear it. Send a note or wander through the archive — I reply to everything myself.

"}